So, we have a character who has already made up their mind on how they want to do things (The Boss), but then comes along a character who has a completely different method, and just decides to veto the situation and take over just because they think they know better (Kinzie)...
And just to be clear, you're siding with the first character, and don't approve of the second character...
Let me just find something... Ah, here we go...
Pierce: "You and I enter the casino here...once inside we need to distract this security guard, I was thinking you could catch me cheating, or some shit like that. Anyway, while the guard's concerned with throwing me out, Gat'll sneak in through this security door...don't worry, I already got today's passcode from the blackjack dealer Shaundi's fucking. Now, once inside, Gat'll have to sneak past the guards to cut the power....when that happens we only have about 45 seconds before the backup generator turns on. During the blackout, though-"
Johnny Gat: "Hold up man...I mean, I love the dream house you built here and everything. But what if we just start here...walk into the casino, and just shoot all the motherfuckers that are between us and the money?"
So... According to your logic, you'd side with Pierce over Gat. Interesting.
Pierce has also been bullied by Shaundi, Viola was bullied by Pierce, Josh Birk was bullied by The Boss...
So those results would be... Pierce over Shaundi - Viola over Pierce - Birk over The Boss... Or is this purely a "Boss only privilege" and any other Saint that gets bullied can just "suck it up"?